Mackman Research was commissioned by a social sector recruitment agency to mystery shop 22 (undisclosed) general stores, in Suffolk. The mystery shopper was asked to purchase cigarettes, alcohol, or a kitchen knife (sharps). The purpose of the mystery shop was to test the proof of age I.D. request at each store within the 25 years and under policy.
A 21 year old male researcher conducted the mystery shopping. He wore smart / casual clothing. During the mystery shop exercise, it was found that the store group no longer stock kitchen knives or any other sharp implements, therefore purchases were made of cigarettes and alcohol only.
The mystery shop exercise was conducted in one day during the hours of 10am and 4.20pm.
Precisely half of the mystery shopped stores failed to ask our researcher for I.D. when purchasing either cigarettes or alcohol. Our researcher made detailed observations at each location. He noted that there were two occasions where I.D. was requested, but it appeared to be a last minute gesture that was prompted by text on a till screen. In addition, the majority of stores which did not request I.D. were found to be located in areas where there appeared to be a high density of social housing. Mackman Research provided the client with strong results to support an in-house assignment.
Thank you for the work the Mackman Group did for me earlier this year. Your staff completely understood what I wanted to achieve right from the start of the project. The information you provided me in the mystery shops was concise yet comprehensive. Furthermore the report you supplied me not only covered everything I had specified but also included additional comments of interest and of use to me. I would certainly recommend the Mackman Group for Mystery Shops.Paula Mcpherson, Director
What Our Clients Say
See how our insight makes a measurable difference.
Our latest Blog Posts
From research tips to industry updates.
Research Briefs | Understanding your Needs
Mackman Research Earns MRS Accreditation
A Guide to Margin of Error, Confidence, and the Reliability vs Validity Debate